The REAL Poverty Map of Europe 2026 (ALL Countries Ranked)
Video Overview & Insights
📊 Redrawing the global economic landscape. In this video, we rank every European nation—alongside the US, Canada, and Australia—using a highly robust, standardized methodology.
I’m curious because of the “UK velocity. Mississippi “ comparisons .
🔍 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐝𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲: Rather than looking at absolute survival lines or raw GDP, we use the Relative Poverty Rate, defined as the percentage of the population living below 60% of the national median disposable income (after taxes and social transfers). This metric accurately captures how hard it is to get by in each specific society, fully adjusted for the local cost of living.
🏛️ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬:: All data is sourced directly from the World Bank’s Poverty and Inequality Platform (PIP) and the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) database, ensuring a highly harmonized, peer-reviewed, and academically solid comparison.
life in the Netherlands is good, because they have a good balance between life and work.
💡 Discover the deep structural, historical, and legislative drivers behind wealth inequality. Subscribe for more in-depth, data-driven geopolitical and economic analyses.
_____________________________________________________
Europe
If you want to help us spread the word about our project to showcase the wonders of European culture and society, please 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼 👍, 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲 to our channel, and 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗸 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗶𝗰𝗼𝗻 to turn on all notifications 👍.
It doesn't cost you anything, but it would mean a lot to us.
Relative can be very relative
𝗧𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸𝘀 𝘀𝗼 𝗺𝘂𝗰𝗵! 🙏🙏🙏
Europe.
More User Perspectives
Sorry but BULL! 🤥😵💫🤕🥂
@bogdanv4981Europe
@SimonWiegerTo all those who are offended or pissed because they think that their country or economic ideology is misrepresented in this video:
If I, for example, was able to work (any job) in The Netherlands, but at the same time lived in Bulgaria I would be (very) rich there.
But that's not what this video is about!
This video is about RELATIVE poverty: How many people are poor RELATIVE to the living standard of the country THEY LIVE IN.
Europe
@martinoverstreet237Europe
@volkerollesch7538Europe
@clivethomas9829Europe
@clivethomas9829The definition used here is 60% of the median income after taxes and benefits, according to the EU’s common measure of the risk of poverty (at-risk-of-poverty or AROPE)
This is a measurement mainly relevant to OECD countries
Als Schweizer kann ich dieses "Ranking" nicht nachvollziehen. In der Schweiz sind die Löhne relativ hoch, was hier als arm bezeichnet wird, gehört in Deutschland zur Mittelschicht. Italiener Leben zu 70% in einem Eigenheim und haben keine Zusatzkosten bei Zusatzleistungen, während dessen in der Schweiz die Eigenheim rate nur 30% beträgt, die meisten davon müssen dafür noch eine Hypotheke aufnehmen. Dazu bezahlen wir noch 10% der unserer Gesundheitskosten selbst. Trotzdem, Von Skandinavien über die Baltik, runter über Polen nach Italien, kann sich kaum einer im Weltweiten vergleich als Arm bezeichnen.
@Nebukadnezar2036this video is made by Ukrainian.
@JakubSzczepan-f800sYou have no Doubt
@christianmad309I think what is considered "poor" in Europe, is still considered far above worldwide standards, nearly everyone can sustain a car, healthcare, enough food etc.etc. The same in Canada, Australia, but the USA has a real poor population, most can't even afford basic necessities.
@Nebukadnezar2036Total crap
@ralftjongakiet1915BS
@roelwillems.6014Russia between Canada and Austria - what kind of data are you using?! Belarus and Albania on top?!
@koskos758Not sure what is going on with this vid but its glitching out and failing intermittently.
@o.w.i.mWtf! does the comment that many have here, just saying Europe? What do you people mean?
@runejohansen3332what a capitalist propaganda - Ursula must be paying Amazing Europe good money to push this narrative.
@enuajsifotoWhat is GDP?
The neoclassical economist thinks asset prices represent wealth, but this isn’t true.
When asset prices have fallen sufficiently, we start to think about what wealth really is.
The Americans had thought rising asset prices represented real wealth, until the Wall Street Crash of 1929.
They had trusted the markets to tell them what was going on in the economy, but this had proved to be a big mistake.
They needed something new to tell them what was really going on in the economy and they invented GDP.
GDP measures economic activity in the economy; the new items produced and sold every year in the economy.
That’s where the real wealth in the economy lies.
It may not be perfect, but it's the best measure we have and this is why global policymakers want to grow GDP.
GDP represents the wealth being produced by the economy.
This is why we want to grow GDP.
It was time to move to macro economics, they had discovered there was no such thing as individual wealth.
The economy generates wealth.
if those are the results you must be working with a totally useless bullshit model😂😂😂
@travellingcaptain1I used to keep nearly all my savings in a bank account. I had about $320,000 there, but the interest was so low that it hardly made any difference.
@aksenovjcsx982Kazakhstan in more central Asia than Europe and your numbers on some countries are way off,this must be a joke.
@gawieswart4388USA's 25.9% is even worse than I thought. Luckily those people still believe that they live in the best, wealthiest, and freest country on Earth. Keeping your people uneducated, no questions asked. Uncle Don knows best!
@0031.yourmoralcompassCan we all agree on one thing without any discussion?
"Europe is STUNNING"
Isn't poverty and equality 2 different things?
Based on inequality, poverty doesn't necessarily mean poor.
"Poland remains deeply divided between Poland A and Poland B. This was true twenty years ago but things have moved on. There is no way Białystok could be described as underdeveloped or struggling.
@bobikdylanThe 60% poverty threshold is a total nonsense.
@billdoodson4232Europe
@dinylubbers1811I would love you, to tell us all, the factual number of really wealthy subjects in each of these places...5 in each, 10 or, maybe even 15!??
Reason for my wish is the - by now - very visible sign of pure psychopathy among the self proclaimed "elies"...
My opinion, as an expert, this is the 5 most poorest counties in the Europe, Serbia, Bosnia, Macedonia, Moldavia and Ukraine.
@PetarMišić-p7zDeutschland?
@annabielecki909You are forgetting the British Public: That mendacious pair will not be forgiven for what they said in the interview and the book, the damaging lies and their so called children. You are living in a fool's paradise if you think anyone in this country will want either of them to run a charity, open a hospital or do anything else in the public eye. They would never settle into the Royal mold but always court publicity, pose for the camera and expect adulation at every turn. They are both beyond the pale. Wise up! The best thing for them is to just fade into obscurity, get jobs and take responsibility for their own lives.
@Miffins4448People with poor attention spans and low IQs fabricate and spam their delusions as “accusations” against the filmmaker, who then has to prove he isn't a camel. The internet is being taken over by idiots and semi-illiterates.
@albertopiergiorgi5980Meaningless comparison. Statistically poor in some countries is far richer than being statistically wealthy in some of the others.
Also the constant nagging of housing cryses and flat tax rate are moronic. Changing those would not solve anything. So those that made this video are about reliable and as confident as the average AI bot nowadays.
Europe. — To be noted. The most important observation is to observe wealth differences (neoliberalism has for many decades, as in Sweden, constantly increased wealth differences to this "genius" gini coefficient wealth inequality measure of approx. 85%, actually higher than in the USA that gini approx 83%). Lars Syll in Sweden.
The latest data from the 2026 Oxfam Sweden Report ("Vårt ojämlika Sverige") and the UBS Global Wealth Report confirms that Sweden's Wealth Gini coefficient sits near 0.79 to 0.85 (or 79% to 85%), ranking Sweden as the sixth most wealth-unequal country in the world. It is therefore due to the system that is designed (for the already richest through inheritance and non-taxation of this and wealth collected as equity in one-man consulting companies according to tax-advantaged political design and) the financial sector (which benefits the already financially wealthy (commercial companies, property owners as well as property investments for speculative rental of housing as private landlords, also hotel ownership etc.) that creates money thanks to credit on existing financial assets which, thanks to the system like a casino, could be reinvested in the same assets, for example stocks, bonds and stock options in Europe or the USA, futures), not wage differences or income differences in Northern Europe. Isn't Serbia in the video?
The poverty rate has little to say... because here in the Nordic countries the poverty rate is completely different from the rest of the world.. so i will say.. its 0% comp to US or others.. min is high standard
@Marie_0901Your interpretation of the Swiss poverty rate is the typical hogwash people publish when they blindly use numbers without understanding the mechanics of a specific economy. In Switzerland, the earnings are so high and the usual living costs are so low (so the savings rate is SOO high, as borne out by the OECD numbers) that a considerable percentage of the population only has to work part-time to finance their living expenses. This percentage - mainly among young professionals without children - is so high, that it substantially increases the number of households that earn below the 60% average threshold for "poverty" calculations. But the reality is that these calculated "poverty stricken" parts of the population are actually enjoying the benefits of sky-high average earnings! 😂😂
@christheswiss390Nope. This is not true.
@dral9971Do the USA excuding black and Hispanics -- the figure will be dramatically better
@leonardbolton-h5kAmbitious come to the uUSA -- spon gers go elsewhere
@leonardbolton-h5kDid I miss Poland and Albania?
@christophertaylor1708Europe
@christophertaylor1708One clear chart would replace 40 minutes of "serial" . . . plodding / step by step / verbal blithering. Such videos are conceptional rubbish and disrespectful wastes of everyone's time (including yours).
@Ye-Olde-Veteran-FRHow do you define europe ? EU ?Geografically?
It`s strange that you put its boundaries as west as the Dardanelles and as east as Kazachstan!
I can not imagine of any argument geografical or political, that puts such a country in europe , it being on the same geografical meridian as Afganistan!
Or is it conveniance , because of it`s resources?